Welcome To Jon Waraas dot Com
Go For 1st Ranking, The Rest Is Worthless
February 9th, 2008 by Jon Waraas


Behold the colorful (gay looking) SERP traffic chart…

seo traffic chart

Did you notice the huge difference between 1st and 2nd place? I’m no math guy, but it looks like the difference is about 42.91%!!! Thats a lot! That 42.91% is the reason why you need to work your ass off for the 1st place for whatever keyword you are going for. You may only get 100 uniques a day right now being in second place, but when you do make it up to first place you might get 500 uniques a day, a huge difference.

Just imagine the amount of traffic you would get if your keyword was getting you 1000 uniques a day being in second place? Just something to think about, don’t be lazy and get that 1st SERPS ranking ;)

Follow me on my journey of success and failures, it should be a fun ride.... Again, here is the link for the RSS feed.

Random Posts

Comments are Dofollow! My thanks to you for contributing to the discussion

27 Comments

Comment by Guitar Hero 4
2008-02-09 16:24:52

I been working my ass off for serps the past week. Built over 1000 links (for free too). I just made it to #3 for “Guitar Hero 4″ and its bringing in over 500 uniques a day alone. Its nice to know I still have visitors to look forward to. Im working on “Guitar hero 3″ now. Im on page 3 for that. Still getting absolutely shit from adsense though. Just added ttz media hopefully that will help bring some money.

 
Comment by Tom Royce
2008-02-09 17:20:53

John

Where did you get the image from? Excellent information.

 
Comment by Tom Royce
2008-02-09 17:21:15

Sorry, fat fingers, meant Jon…

 
Comment by Jon Waraas
2008-02-09 17:35:29

Yeah, trust me. Its a big change when you finally get 1st.

Tom,

I have had that image forever, there are a lot more articles on this matter, I will try and find somemore.

 
Comment by Tom Royce
2008-02-09 17:36:47

Thanks

If you find it I will do a post on my blog and give you some nice link juice… :)

 
Comment by extreme webmaster
2008-02-09 19:56:27

Hmm… I agree that the best thing to own is the 1st place, but I wouldn’t agree on % of clicks and time spent.

Some 2nd or 3rd results may outweigh the 1st result, if the first one is poorly written. I have managed to do that for some of my websites.

That’s because some websites have much link juice, but really poorly written title and description meta tags.

Example: someone searches for “early spring flower care”

And you get “superbamazingflowers.com – your flowers, flower gifts…etc” as the first result (the title). And the description is also filled with keywords, instead of actually describing the page.

Now imagine the second result is “how to tend to your flowers in early spring” and the description “early spring flower care explained: an easy guide”.

Which one would you click on? Not everyone clicks automatically on the first result, there is a lot of people who actually read to find the best match for their search.

With that being said, quality AND 1st place in SERPs are the best thing to do.

 
Comment by Guitar Hero 4
2008-02-09 20:26:41

I just moved from 2nd to 1st on another one of my big keywords. Ill let you know how it goes as next week comes around. Weekend traffic is skewed cuase all the kids are home.

 
Comment by Guitar Hero 4
2008-02-09 20:30:55

I do know having a quality site above you does hurt traffic for the lower people though. A site I traded links with was above me and they used to send me 30-40 uniques a day. Now that i moved above them, I got 6 uniques from them today.

 
Comment by Wes Mahler
2008-02-09 22:56:11

Sweet chart to visually show the difference, where is the chart from?

 
Comment by The Dino
2008-02-10 14:23:05

Well problem is to find teh keyword which has some traffic and there is not much competition arround. I can be first for the dino or thedino but doesnt bring any traffic and in first case there is 1mil competitors and no traffic at all but I have some keywords which has less competitors and brings like 50 visitors per day on the first spots in Google. But I was lucky to find those keywords and become first in SERP. I am wondering if it is possible to do it other way and not just be lucky.

 
Comment by Mark
2008-02-10 15:30:50
 
Comment by Mark
2008-02-10 15:31:32

Oh and I think you mean 429% not, 42.9% :)

 
Comment by Jon Waraas
2008-02-10 15:48:24

Between first and second place? Its 42.9% difference..

 
Comment by MathGuy
2008-02-10 17:25:11

Nope. Click on the link on my name to calculate the real percentage. You are talking about percentage points ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percentage_point )

 
Comment by Mark
2008-02-10 18:17:31

If you even round it, 50% and 10% how is 50% only have more than 10%? :)

 
Comment by Mark
2008-02-10 20:47:38

Blah, can’t even type. basically 56.36/13.45 = 4.19. So as a raw percentage, 56% is approximately 4 times that of 13%, ergo it is over 400% improvment.

For instance if there was 1000 searches up for grabs per month, a 1st position would get you 564 visitors, a 2nd place would get you 136. 415% of 136 is 564.

 
Comment by Jon Waraas
2008-02-11 00:08:48

Haha, like I said Im no math guy. But I think we can all agree that is a big difference.. :)

 
Comment by Soulja Boy
2008-02-11 14:11:54

Thats 100% True!

 
Comment by Marcel
2008-02-11 23:18:40

I remember discovering that even being #11 was better than 5,6,7,8,9,10

#11 is #1 on page 2 :)

 
Comment by Mark
2008-02-12 04:38:51

@Jon

Agreed ;)

 
Comment by Miley Cyrus
2008-02-17 15:32:17

I think you have to consider the first site s also usually the most reliant.

 
Comment by Pete
2008-02-20 13:09:02

Agree that number 1 is a huge difference but also extremely dependent upon the keyword searched. I’ve got long tail searches that pop to number one, but if I could get a broad keyword to number 1….that’s when everything takes off.

 
Comment by Barrera
2008-02-21 15:41:13

Where did the data come from? Looks great but just curious to see how accurate the numbers are.

 

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.